Senate gridlock, 2 party fraud, credit card cap, supreme court rules on election money, EPA-CO2
www.platformforthefuture.com The Stench of Truth (280).mp4 We can hope for AT LEAST gridlock in the Senate since Brown won. There are many permutations on this issue. We need to focus on independent candidates, that is independent of corporate money. We need to focus on breaking the dialectic of the two party fraud. We need to go after the banks and credit cards hard. A national usury rate would be a great first step. There is a bill in the House to do so, work to get it passed. The supreme court has ruled basically that corporations and unions as well as other special interest groups can spend freely on elections. This might not be all bad as it might reveal the truth we all know to the stupid MSM zombies that the corporations already run the show. They may act so obviously and egregiously that even blind people would be forced to see it. There is also a bill in the senate to stop the EPA from regulating CO2. This is good news and should be supported as it will at least slow down the actions on “climate change” and prevent unilateral action on the part of this administration.
Tags: EPACO2, senate, supreme, party, court, election, Money, gridlock
Related posts:
I disagree. if you look at some of his many video’s youll see that he is indeed educated and this can be seen as well in one of his arguments Tenebroust vs cstrand31 in his video
(Victory in Copenhagen! Healthcare still looms. Issues linked by population control and eugenics). even though I respected cstrand31 as he was educated it seems, he was still wrong. every comment is appreciated but at least list where you think he’s wrong.
Stench of COINTELPRO
This guy is an Excellent example of cointelpro…
fake logic
emotions
artificial rage
half truths
repeating things
propaganda
Can’t Take Back the Public Square?
LIKE HELL YOU CAN’T!
For Networked Citizen Lobbying (and the most politically realizable avenue for the public-finance-of-elections if desired):
The INDIVIDUALLY-Controlled/COMMONS-Dedicated Account!
An essential component for association and action in a global commons!
Blog CulturalEngineer (dot) blogspot (dot) com (the theoretical background…I’m a cultural anthropologist)
Demo Chagora (dot) com
LinkedIn linkedin (dot) com/in/culturalengineer
I mean, they’re all rich, all take campaign money from entrenched interests and all of them are connected to their business community via large contributions. If I were to listen to him, I’d think the whole lot of them are corrupt and part of the problem” I’d say to that person, you’re right… that’s exactly what I’m saying. This is why, in my earlier comment, I said that the current system simply cannot be saved, period. There must be a wholly new system created WITH strict term limits.
Well, being that you’re asking my opinion, here it is.. when in doubt, simply follow the money. If the candidate has received ANY money from major business, any political action group/committee, any major industry or has, themselves, obvious exaggerated wealth, odds are very, very high that they are nothing more than more of the same problem. One might read this and think “well, this guy thinks that everybody who presently is in government is part of the problem.. (con’t)
I Agree. Search: “The Strangest Political Secret”
Agreed, I think the problem with 3rd party candidates & people write them off is that the big support for them is in the national campaigns like US Senator, Gov or President.. I think if we focused on lower office first, it would show that it is possible to win.. Then build from there
Why indeed my friend?
this isn’t free speech - it is bought speech.
why should money have the same rights as a citizen?
How about voting for the Constitution Party?
even ron paul?
Thanks for the video and info.
Really enjoying your vids as a new sub. Thanks for your thoughts. I agree with your concepts, but i don’t accept that the solution to our nation’s peril lies in our government or choosing the right elected officials, supporting the right legislation or reforming the system as it is. the system as it is must end and a new strictly Constitutional-based system built. The only question in my mind is the best way to do that and if it can be done without bloodshed or popular revolt.
Thanks again
ugh banker defending …. i dont think it will catch on.
It is important to seek out positions on all of these issues, at least to hold them accountable if and when they fail to deliver.
and you’re right, 16% is way too high but as you said, it would be a START.
imo the first question I would ask of any candidate is aer they willing to support a FED audit and eventually shutting that behemoth down. This Brown guy is just another corporate owned puppet imo. they just voted in the ‘other’ asshole.
That is the first step in any election.
Of course, most things that are good and noble have been made to be hard or unpleasant to do.
Yes, but he did win the republican primary and had republican help. So he has to be lumped in with them for now, but as I say it is a bit more complicated too.
Lots of idiots.
As I said in the end all the corporate money may finally illustrate what’s going on. You’re right too about things happening anyway, they have and will.
Multipartism is an illusion.
The US (and some other countries) have put themselves on a one way track. Where they are moving to is well known.
Every politician, especially elected politicians, put into power will take the same course. Because there is no other option for him.
When he comes to power and sees the situation by his own eyes, he will understand that the current policy is the least harmful for his people and the only one likely to bring him into power once more.
each other.
Dont blame the bankers. What they are asked for is impossible. They cant maintain the robbing as wealth is getting scarce.
Blame either people who chose such a model and or people who supported it.
Bankers are simply agents here.
If you read fully this quote, without any pre conceived mind, you notice that expansion was on the map since day one.
Robbing from another human group to enrich your own was nothing new at that time and the consequences were known:
to sustain the model, you need:
people to rob from and wealth to rob from them.
Currently, the wealth to be robbed is lagging behind the needs.
And when this happens, people from the robbing group dont suddenly decide to stop robbing, they increase robbing